Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for August, 2009

Reflections from the Barbed Wire Monastery

By:  Prison Bob

Letter from Prison Bob

Letter from Prison Bob

I grew up “within” the Episcopal Church.  To my way of thinking, it equates to the Catholic Church, except for no Hail Marys.  It was in this environment that probably around the age of fourteen I began to drift away from their teachings.

My drift wasn’t caused by a feeling of untenable expectations or of perfections unattainable.  I recall thinking how sad it was that even then I knew the service by rote.  I needed more than a cyclic three year change.

The same reasons I did poorly in Church were exhibited in my schooling.  I was bored.  When I went with the family on Sundays, I knew it was going to be:  sing, listen, up-down, up-down, communion, sing, sing, up-down, bye-bye.  Every time.

When I began working full time, I made sure to be scheduled on Sundays, so I could justifiably miss services.  It was an early avoidance tactic.  During my time in the military, even in Saudi Arabia, I didn’t rely on theology.

I did, however, re-explore Christianity when I was imprisoned.  With even more time available to me, I still find it personally unsettling.  To see it professed by the people in here who are (all of us) in here for a reason is disconcerting.

To my mind, and please understand that these are all personal observations, religion is a placating drug.  People will do all sorts of odd things to engender a sense of community.

I would rather (and this is my practice) be at ease with two or three people out of the roughly 1,000 here, than be a member of a group, which I find dishonest.

I have recently watched the transformation of a self-proclaimed Wiccan.  Here is a man, who, two months ago, would aim his entreaties at a tree or rabbit, now wandering around carrying a King James Version Bible.

Why?  Because he sees a chance at release.  After twenty-plus years inside, a woman wrote him.  After some money mailed to him and three visits, this former Wiccan is now enrolled in marriage preparation classes in the Chapel.

He goes up for parole next year.  I wouldn’t find this nearly so curious, if he and his long-time lover didn’t already live across the building from me.

My views and beliefs may be wholly incorrect.  But they are mine, and I will continue to hold them until – well, probably the entirety of my existence.  I am an ignorant man.

I can discuss those things in which I am interested.  But there is too much knowledge and information for any one of us to know it all.  I would rather be honest in my convictions and lose out on “salvation”, rather than live what I feel is a lie.

No singular philosophy contains all the answers needed in life.  Continual compromise and adaptability are needed to continue existence.  Time-frame – whether neolithic or modern, is irrelevant.  The problems I find with religion reside in the mythical singularity.

If any of the big three had a singular approach, there wouldn’t be sects or denominations.  However, when you add humanity’s inquisitive and disagreeable nature, you automatically add disharmony.

Enough for today.

Read Full Post »

The God Virus at Reed

Presenting the RSA’s Fall 2009 Lecture

The God Virus

The God Virus

Join the Reed Secular Alliance as we welcome author Dr. Darrel Ray to speak about The God Virus.  The lecture will take place on Wednesday, October 7th, 2009 in the Chapel of Eliot Hall.

Dr. Ray will chart the contagion course of religion in our society, as it affects our behavior, sex lives, and virtually every aspect of living.  The lecture starts at 7:30 pm and will be followed by a book-signing.

We hope to see you there!

Read Full Post »

Zakk Swezey died at 17 from a treatable illness

Zakk Swezey died at 17 from a treatable illness

It’s happened again.  On March 15th, Zakk Swezey took ill.  His parents thought he had food poisoning.  But Swezey’s condition worsened.  What did his parents do?  The answer is they prayed; no visits to the emergency room, no medications, no nothing.  The Church Elders were called, but that was the extent of the family’s concern, since they believed in faith-healing.  On March 18th, Swezey died.  The cause?  A ruptured appendix.

You may be wondering what happened to Swezey’s parents.  The answer is that the case is still under investigation.  What’s so troubling is that if a woman hears the voice of God instructing her to starve her children, the insane asylum is her destination.  However, when a Christian denies medical treatment to a minor, culminating in his death, that is protected under a Washington state statute.

Although it may appear shocking, Washington State law has an exemption for faith healing.  Apparently, it specifies that if treated “by a duly accredited Christian Science practitioner in lieu of medical care, [the child] is not considered deprived of medically necessary health care or abandoned.”  Sadly, the law is on the side of Swezey’s parents.  However, in this case, the problem is not only with the parents; it is also with the law.

Read Full Post »

Confessions from the Barbed Wire Monastery

By:  Prison Bob

The inside of a prison cell

The inside of a prison cell

In this series, the Reed Secular Alliance has opened up a window into life in prison.  For the past several months, we have posted Letters from the Barbed Wire Monastery, which are a prisoner’s reflections about atheism, prison, and his own psyche.  In this edition, Prison Bob speaks about his crime and the effects of alcohol on his psyche.  It is an interesting read.

Hello.

I have been writing under the pseudonym of “Prison Bob”.   I am an almost 40-year-0ld male who is incarcerated in the state of Oklahoma for the crime of sexual assault on a minor child.

Did I physically do this?  No.  However, I did tell the youngster in question and her mother that I would do so, as I held them at knife point.  Do I deserve the twenty-year sentence I received?  Yes.  Would I change that horrible night, if I were able?  Yes.   Yet I cannot, so the best possible option is to grow from there on out.  In that interest, I write.

I write in order to explore my psyche.  It isn’t always a bright and cheery place.  Sometimes, I find minefields, which cause me to revert to an almost animal state.  Yet those are becoming fewer and farther between.  Now, as the haze of a couple decades worth of outrageously heavy drinking begins to clear, I can actually think.

One school of thought believes that you cease maturation with your first drink and resume the process once your system clears of the poisonous hydrocarbon.  If that is true, then I’m almost driving age.  If it isn’t true, then I’m just another idiot in prison for acting on unrestrained emotion.  Okay – not emotion – pure animal instinct.  I almost said greed, but only humans are greedy, by my way of thinking.

However, history proves that my way of thinking has not been to the benefit of others or humanity as a whole.  Yet, I still try.  And even manage to do well sometimes.

Thanks.

-Prison Bob

Read Full Post »

Inside the Mind of a Creationist

Reflections on a Trip to the Creation Museum

By:  Patrick Julius

Patrick Julius (far right) and SSA Executive Director August Brunsman

Patrick Julius (far right) and SSA Executive Director August Brunsman

Editor’s Note:  Patrick Julius is the founder and President of the Secular Student Alliance chapter at the University of Michigan.  Recently, Julius attended the national Secular Student Alliance (SSA) conference in Ohio.  The convention included the opportunity to go to the Creation Museum in Kentucky.  About 300 attendees went, and the following are Patrick’s reflections on the experience.

Recently I visited the Creation Museum in Kentucky. One exhibit above all hangs in my mind: A diagram showing the complex evolution of ape species, gorillas, orangutans, chimpanzees; the diagram is largely correct from what I’ve read, though the scale at the side is off by a factor of almost a thousand. But then, beside it is a diagram of human evolution—or lack thereof: It is a straight line, with no change, no divergence. The citation given is for a Bible verse, Acts 17:26. (I looked it up, and even more remarkably it seems that they have abridged the verse significantly, and their translation is nonstandard. Read most literally, it seems to imply only that all humans share a common ancestor, presumably Adam.) This nicely encapsulates their whole worldview: Human beings are different from all other animals, and our reading of the Bible is more important than any amount of empirical evidence. The rest of the Museum is really only so much expounding upon this one point.

Another important exhibit, also characteristic of the Museum, is what my friend called “atheistland.” This exhibit is a short, winding alley sprayed with graffiti and plastered with news articles; the general sense seems to be that this world of crime, vandalism, suffering, moral relativism (and, the exhibit can’t help but add, gay rights, secularism and feminism) is the terrible result of people turning away from God and the Bible. In fact, crime and suffering have decreased in recent decades and centuries (Pinker talks at TED about why this might be so), moral relativism is ridiculous but usually harmless (since no one actually believes it; they just like tearing down other people’s morals), and gay rights, secularism, and feminism are among the best things ever to happen to the human race. But this is plainly not how Creationists see things.

And I must confess, I have difficulty sympathizing with these people. I just can’t wrap my mind around the idea that millions of otherwise normal people could believe the Earth is only 6,000 years old. I keep feeling that they must be lying, or miscommunicating, or something; they can’t possibly really believe what they say they do.

In fact, maybe they don’t. I don’t think anyone believes in Adam and Eve the way I believe the Earth is round. The way I believe the Earth is round is such a simple, obvious matter; look, it’s round. This is clearly not how people believe in Creationism; the world doesn’t look 6,000 years old. It’s not obvious that tyrannosaurs used to be herbivorous; nor do I think it could seem obvious to anyone. Belief in Creationism could be like the way I believe in quantum mechanics; it isn’t at all obvious—indeed, it’s quite counter-intuitive—but the evidence in its favor is too overwhelming to ignore. But really, I think people believe in Creationism the way I believe in justice, or the way I believe in morality. You can’t just look at the world and see without a doubt that justice is possible, or that morality is absolute; yet on a deep level I do hold to these propositions.

Yet even this isn’t quite right, since in believing in justice I don’t have to discount a massive body of scientific evidence; rather, it merely seems like the sort of thing that cannot be directly accessed through experiment and observation. But Adam and Eve, Noah’s Ark, and herbivorous tyrannosaurs—these are the sort of thing that ought to be accessible to empirical study; it’s just that under such study they fail miserably. Yet people continue to profess belief in these things.

The explanation for this may ultimately rest on Dennett’s concept of “belief in belief”: No one really believes in herbivorous tyrannosaurs, but they do in fact believe in morality (the same way I believe in morality), and furthermore believe that in order to sensibly believe in morality, one must profess a belief in herbivorous tyrannosaurs. Voltaire wrote, “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” I agree; but I think Creationists believe quite the opposite, that in order to not commit atrocities, you must believe (or claim to believe) absurdities.

If this is correct, then no amount of scientific evidence for evolution will be persuasive to any Creationist; we must instead offer moral evidence, to show that herbivorous tyrannosaurs are not a necessary (or even beneficial) part of a sound human ethic. The answer will not be found in science, but in humanism.

Read Full Post »

Dan Barker of the FFRF and Leslie Zukor

Dan Barker of the FFRF and Leslie Zukor

The Reed Secular Alliance is pleased to announce that club President, Leslie Zukor, won Honorable Mention in the Freedom From Religion Foundation’s annual college essay competition.  Leslie was pleased to be selected as a winner, especially since this is her second try at the competition.

“I am excited about winning Honorable Mention,” Zukor explains.  “There were nearly 200 applications, and I feel honored that an organization such as the FFRF felt my essay was worthy of a prize,” she said.  The award carries a $250 scholarship.

Zukor, who wrote about her journey from conservative crusader to atheist advocate, will have excerpts of her winning essay published in Freethought Today, the FFRF’s monthly newsletter.  Upon her winning, Zukor was immediately congratulated by club members and  leaders in the movement.

Read Full Post »

Editor’s Note:  The following is the text of Reed Secular Alliance President, Leslie Zukor’s letter to the editor of the Oregonian.  Although this letter wasn’t published, it is the latest in the RSA’s efforts to stand up for science and rational thought.

I am disappointed by Charles Hunter’s (August 1st) characterization of the practitioners of rational thought.  As the President of the Reed Secular Alliance, a college atheist and freethought group, I know that the majority of freethinkers are not advocates of genocide.

Contrary to Hunter’s assertion, leaders who use rational thought do not kill millions of their own people.  In reality, the atheists I know rebuild houses in New Orleans, give food to the hungry, and donate books to prisoners. In short, we are concerned with creating a just society in this our only chance at life.

If the world were populated with more clear-thinking rationalists, I am confident that it would be a better place to live.  In a universe of careful observation and analysis, Ava Worthington would have had the best of medical care.  Now she is dead, and we have only religious dogmatism to blame.

Leslie A. Zukor
President, Reed Secular Alliance
Portland, Oregon

Read Full Post »

A "Beware of Dogma" sign in Texas

A "Beware of Dogma" sign in Texas

Although religion is often benign, it is dangerous when dogma harms children.  Recently, Ava Worthington, the girl whose parents rejected conventional medicine on religious grounds, died at just fifteen months of pneumonia and a blood infection.  A course of antibiotics could have cured her.

While Worthington’s parents have been charged with manslaughter, several readers of The Oregonian have sounded off about the case.  R. Curtis Bosworth, for instance, stated that religious dogma was to blame for the neglect of Worthington.  Many others have concurred.

Although writers have understood the dangers of religious faith, Charles Hunter of Northwest Portland would prefer to side with dogma.  “I’d rather align with the religious thought that says ‘love thy neighbor,’ than with the ‘rational’ thought of [Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, and Mao], who firmly rejected religion.”

Since Leslie Zukor knows that rational thought does not lead to genocide, the Reed Secular Alliance President spoke up. “[T]he atheists I know rebuild houses in New Orleans, give food to the hungry, and donate books to prisoners,” Zukor explained in a Letter to the Editor of The Oregonian.

Putting one’s faith in an invisible entity, instead of in demonstrable science, is a recipe for disaster.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.