Editor’s Note: This is the second of a four part series on the American Humanist Association’s 68th annual conference, which RSA President, Leslie Zukor, is attending. The event, which is taking place in Phoenix, brings together humanists from across the United States, to discuss issues as diverse as non-theist ethics and the Obama administration’s attitudes toward non-believers. We hope that you will enjoy Zukor’s reflections.
Although I missed the early morning lectures, I still had a great time at the second day of the AHA Conference. In point of fact, most of Friday was spent socializing with the Secular Student Alliance. My interactions with staff humanized my longest standing relationship with a national non-theist group. This is my fourth year as a member of the Secular Student Alliance, and I am excited to continue my relationship with the nation’s only freethought organization explicitly advocating for the interests of atheist students.
While I had always believed in the Secular Student Alliance’s mission, no longer were August Brunsman and Lyz Liddell mere names on an email. Instead I talked with SSA staff about topics as diverse as the Freethought Books Project and my blogging and photography skills. Lyz Liddell, intern Jonathan Sussman, and I tabled for the SSA, while August was in meetings, and during that time, we discussed the merits of various freethought clubs.
In addition to socializing with the SSA, I attempted to inquire about the Secular Student Alliance Board of Directors results. Unfortunately, my dreams of SSA Board glory were met with a “We’ll see on Tuesday” response from staff. Although that wasn’t the answer I wanted to hear, I anxiously await the results. Since I strongly believe in the mission of the Secular Student Alliance, I want to do whatever I can to advance the cause of humanism on campuses across the country.
Although I spent a long while tabling for the SSA, there was still time to attend the William Lobdell lecture about Losing My Religion. Lobdell, who spoke last week in Portland, gave a similar version of his speech at Powell’s books in Portland. This time, however, Lobdell was careful not to critique the atheist movement. Instead of telling freethought groups that they have no social skills, he appealed to those without religion by emphasizing his non-belief. It was his conviction that the true debate was not between atheism and theism, but whether or not someone believed in a personal god.
Since I was invigorated by meeting so many atheist activists today, I am quite excited for tomorrow’s session. The keynote will be given by renowned atheist blogger, PZ Myers. It should be a great time.










Lobdell seems a bit confused. You write: “It was his conviction that the true debate was not between atheism and theism, but whether or not someone believed in a personal god.”
These are the same thing! Theism *means* belief in a personal God. Deists and pantheists are really non-theists; what we usually think of as “atheism” is really slightly stronger, to adeism. But once you get to the point of deism, there really isn’t much point in arguing.
Lobdell realizes this, but then so does Dawkins (read his preface to the God Delusion about “Einsteinian religion”), and I suspect Harris and Dennett would concur, if not Hitchens as well. So really I don’t see where the disagreement lies.